2 Comments

So you think a peace pill is no possible solution because it will be used by violent men as a weapon against other men. By extension you correctly realize that it is impossible to force a peace pill on all (violent) men. But on the other hand you think it is possible to remove all men from existence (i.e. kill them?).

So you think most men value (their capacity for) violence more than their existence? Or why do you think the latter is easier than the former?

Expand full comment
author

Thanks again for engaging Marcel.

I've been discussing a world without men for years, and everyone always wants me to provide all the answers. When I can't, they take that as proof that a world without men can't be achieved. While this assumption (if Phil can't do it, nobody can) is quite flattering to me it's also not very serious.

I don't mean to dodge your reasonable questions above, but as a place to start for now, perhaps you'd be interested in the 2nd article in the series which was just posted minutes ago here:

https://www.tannytalk.com/p/world-peace-is-possible-part-2

I'm starting article 3 in the series today, so hope to have that for you shortly.

How to remove violent men from existence? Stop making them.

Expand full comment